Archive for daryl bradford smith

A Deceiver Exposed

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on January 4, 2009 by nousername1


Eric Hufschmid wrote the book Painful Questions: An Analysis Of The September 11th Attack. He has also worked on the websites and his current site

In January, 2006 Hufschmid appeared on the Connie Bryan show. He presents himself as a hero of the “911 Truth Movement” and an altruistic crusader against the “Jewish Crime Network.”

Eric Hufschmid is a member of the Jewish criminal network that he claims to expose. Most of his information is accurate but if you examine it closely it seems to be mixed with lies.

His main purpose seems to be to cause arguments and mistrust among people who are critically examining the Jewish problem as a whole or various aspects of it.  His claim that 99.5% of “truthseekers” are actually “zionists agents” is a deception coming from a man who is working for the Jews himself.  He may even be a Jew.  Although I have no solid evidence that Hufschmid is a Jew, I see no reason not to slander him in the way that He has slandered so many others.  Perhaps he is a Jew and perhaps he is not but he is definitely working for Jews.

Eric’s half-sister Kathryn is married to Rupert Murdoch’s Son. Eric Hufschmid himself states:

“I just discovered that my half-sister, Kathryn Hufschmid (we have the same father, but different mothers), is probably the same Kathryn Hufschmid who married Rupert Murdoch’s son, James.

“I have not seen Kathryn since she was about 4 years old, so she has probably no memory of me. We wondered what happened to her, but my father has no idea because Kathryn did not have enough of an attachment to him to bother keeping in touch.

“This brings me to a question that people often ask me; specifically, how did I get involved in the 9-11 movement?”

Here is the link to Hufschmid’s site where he makes this statement:

As I mentioned previously, Hufschmid has appeared on CNN. You can see from this screen capture that the nice folks at CNN were kind enough to advertise the site that  Hufschmid and his co-conspirator, Daryl Bradford Smith, worked on at the time. This site is At the same time CNN also advertised This site also claimed that Hufschmid’s sister is married to Rupert Murdoch’s son.

I am uncertained as to when Hufschmid admitted this fact on his site, but Hufschmid has said that “I think I wrote this in 2004, I forgot to put a date on it.” It is possible that Hufschmid admitted to his sister’s relationship with Murdoch after it appeared on

Did CNN advertise the site as attempt to smear Hufschmid? I don’t think so. It is my belief that Hufschmid and “Poseidon” of and are in on it together. Let us take a look at a Stormfront thread (click here) featuring “Poseidon of  takeourworldback” where he claims that Brendon O’connell and a host of other people are all “Zionist agents.” Although Poseidon has regularly attacked Hufschmid for calling people “Zionist agents”, Poseidon does exactly the same.

Read the thread and see how little evidence Poseidon has for his accusations. Do not fall into the trap of trusting him because he tells you a little bit of truth that you have not seen somewhere else. These Jews and Jew agents build eachother up and tear each other down as part of their disinformation campaign. These Jews and/or Jew puppets only tell some truth so they can lie to you later.

The thread speaks for itself. I see no reason to explain it all to you. Poseidon’s tactics are fairly transparent. He is an evil, lying Jew or agent of world Jewry. Read it yourself and see what kind of garbage Poseidon is. For more information on this scumbag know as Poseidon go to:

He really is quite the obvious piece of trash and anyone who promotes him as a trustworthy character is guilty of much more than gullibility. I believe that anyone who promotes him is without a doubt a Jew or agent of world Jewry. I do not know enough about the proprietor of to vouch for him but his information pertaining to this pig who calls himself Poseidon appears to be accurate.

Hufschmid, who basically claims that he is the only out there telling the truth about 911 or the Jewish Question has of course slandered countless people as being “Zionist agents.” Hufschmid has even gone so far as to call people who have spent years in Jail for denying the “holocaust” “Zionist agents.

Let us examine some of the people Hufschmid has called “Zionist Agents.”


Ernst Zundel is one of many people who Eric Hufschmid has accused of being a “Zionist agent.” Click here to see hufschmid’s Accusation. Ernst Zundel, a towering figure in the worldwide Holocaust revisionist movement, was born in 1939 in a small town in the Black Forest region of southwestern Germany. He emigrated to Canada at the age of 19, where he soon married and became the father of two sons. Years later setting aside a thriving career as a graphic artist, he resolved to dedicate himself to the great task, as he sees it, of redeeming the sullied reputation of his fellow Germans. Through his Samisdat publishing house he distributed worldwide a prodigious quantity of books, booklets, leaflets, newsletters, & audio & video cassettes. Zundel is probably best known for his central role in the “Holocaust Trials” of 1985 & 1988.

He was brought to court in Toronto on a charge of  “publishing false news,” and specifically for publishing a reprint edition of a booklet entitled Did Six Million Really Die? Zundel’s two lengthy trials — the 1985 trial lasted two months, and the 1988 trial lasted four months — have been the closest thing anywhere to full scale debates on the Holocaust issue. For the first time ever, “Holocaust survivors” and Holocaust historians were closely and critically questioned under oath about their claims and views. As a result of the two trials, an enormous quantity of compelling evidence refuting the Holocaust extermination story was presented to the court and thereby was made part of the permanent public record. The most important of this evidence was the historic testimony of American gas chamber expert Fred Leuchter about his on-site forensic examination of the alleged extermination gas chambers in Poland. Zundel was found guilty in the 1985 trial, but the verdict was set aside by the provincial appeals court, who ruled that the judge in that trial had, among other things, given improper instructions to the jury, and that he had improperly excluded defense evidence.

In May 1988, at the conclusion of the second Zundel trial, the jury declared him guilty. A few days later, he was sentenced to nine months imprisonment. On appeal, Canada’s Supreme Court threw out the conviction, declaring on August 27, 1992, that the archaic “false news” law under which he had been convicted was a violation of the country’s Charter of Rights. This was not only a personal vindication by Canada’s highest court, but also Ernst Zundel had secured an important victory for the rights of all Canadians. After four decades in Canada, including a failed or denied effort to acquire Canadian citizenship, he moved to the United States, where he married Ingrid Rimland in January 2000. For 2 years they lived quietly in eastern Tennessee. Ernst Zundel was then arrested on February 5, 2003, at his home in Tennessee.

He was seized on the pretext that he had missed an interview date with US immigration authorities, even though he had entered the US legally, was married to a US citizen, had no criminal record, and was acting diligently, and in full accord with the law, to secure status as a permanent legal resident. After being held for two weeks, he was deported to Canada. For two years — from mid-February 2003 to March 2005 — he was held in solitary confinement as a supposed threat to “national security.” On March 1, 2005, Zundel was deported to Germany, where he languished in Mannheim prison. He was finally charged with inciting “hatred” by having written or distributed texts that “approve, deny or play down” genocidal actions carried out by Germany’s wartime regime, and which “denigrate the memory of the [Jewish] dead.”

The first and foremost of the writings cited in the indictment are texts posted on the “Zundelsite” web-site, which is registered and maintained by his wife in the United States, where all such writings are entirely legal. Zundel’s trial in Germany began on November 8 2005. Fifteen months later, 67 year old Ernst Zundel was then found guilty and sentenced to 5 years in prison on Monday February 19th, 2007. The Canadian Jewish Congress applauded the conviction & sentence as did many Zionist groups around the world. Germany’s imprisonment of this dissident is a disgrace.

Do you believe that Mr. Zundel is a “Zionist agent?” I don’t.

Eric Hufschmid has also accused Frederick Toben of being a “Zionist Agent.”

Click here to read Hufschmid’s accusation of Toben being a “Zionist agent”.


Dr. Toben was seized for exercising free speech and free thought because of a dark agenda. After the Third Reich collapsed in 1945, Jewish activists saddled post-WWII Germany with thought crime laws so stringent that anyone who doubted the 6-million figure—even an overheard Australian tourist—could be arrested and jailed. This happened to Dr. Toben in Germany in 1999; he spent seven months in prison for expressing his views to German citizens.

David Irving

Irving spent 10 months in jail for “denying the holocaust” and Hufschmid claims that in the cases of these three men that it was an elaborate charade to scare the people into not criticizine the official story of the holocaust.

Why would Hufschmid make such idiotic statements against men who have dedicated their lives to fighting world Jewry and who have gone to jail for the cause?

There can be only one answer.

Eric Hufschmid works for the Jews.

It is also now clear that anyone who supports Eric Hufschmid is at best a useful idiot and at worst under the employ of the Jews as well.

I Believe that Mike Delaney of started off as sincere but has since been subverted by Hufschmid. I will give him the benefit of the doubt and describe him as a useful idiot, possibly unaware of Hufschmid’s plot.

Another site to watch for is which constantly promotes Hufschmid’s bullshit.

Here is a quote from Judenfrei:

“But what if Eric Hufschmid starts describing as the work of agents of Jews?

Eric is not a person who labels people agents of Jews without reason. Neither should the reader pre-assign credibility or lack of credibility to a website based on hearsay. The arguments offered should be examined on their merits. Eric is welcome to suspect the intentions of and criticize it, just as all readers should never let their guard down and suspect the intentions of and any other website like it.

Incidentally, Eric was informed about right after it was put online (March 31, 2009), and Eric replied that he liked the website.”

Eric Hufschmid’s Bumboy Mike Delaney wrote an article entitled “In Defense of Eric Hufschmid”. It is a pathetic attempt to protect Hufschmid. I really do wonder if Delaney is really that stupid or if Hufschmid or the ADL throw Delaney some money. I tried to post a comment in the comment section
but was unable to do so. Most of the comments were in support of Hufschmid, one of them even made the ridiculous claim that Ernst Zundel was Jewish, but one of the commentors had something intelligent to say and this is what he said:

“Mr. Hufschmid (English is my second language so please forgive my faulty English.)

Sir i apologize if i am wasting your time here with me e-mails but please bear with me for a few minutes…

I like to start off with stating that i am not and i never been in a 100% agreement with anyone nor that i think that it is even possible for any two persons to agree with each other 100% on all of the subjects unless one of the two is defective or simply immature. It is normal for people to be equally honest and still disagree or be equally dishonest and still disagree… And in the first case i do not think that disagreement should be a harbinger of bad blood.

Now regarding the Christopher Jon Bjerknes being Jewish issue of previous e-mails Other than your own website and a mirror article posted on DBS website I did a search on the web for several About CJB pages on several web pages and did not come into one instant that states CJB’s alleged Jewishness of any sort including his website and blog. However i must state the fact that my search was anything but extensive. So if you can refer me to a link or an audio snippet in particular i will greatly appreciate it.

All that being said your accusations alarmed me and made me re-listen or listen to the first time to the earliest CJB audio interviews i could found that dates back to January of 2006 and on and few comments and sections caught my attention in the light of your claims that i am going to discuss few of them in the attachment portion of this e-mail.

Now to a more important topic… Your irresponsible, unfounded and sometimes immature claims, accusations and convictions of other people.

I will state only a couple of cases here.

Example #1: Michael A. Hoffman II


Sections: Michael Hoffman wrote about Zundel, “I’m an idiot, but follow me anyway!” & Can you understand what is going on?

Now clearly Mr. Hufschmid you entirely misunderstood the article, In light of the Cartoons attacking the Prophet of Islam Mohammad, Moslems will take note of the double standards and that in it self is not a major problem but it further did raise the debate among moslems to try push and lobby for similar protective laws that would force further censorship and more entrench the thought crime paradigm that will only benefit the Jew in the same manner that the Civil Rights movement and political correctness benefited the Jewish cause and doomed the Western Civilization and the European stock to the point that you can mock the Jesus Christ figure in the most vile ways but you dare not point a finger at the Jewish Holocaust myth.

So it is rather obvious that Mr. Hoffman’s point was germane to the subject more than any other group of people, ideology, sect or religion.

As for the Hoffman-Bollyn question, You pretty much answered this one and to further elaborate… No one is going to address all of the issues with its different angles… Everyone involved do address the issue from one, two or maybe three angles that he is expert on or feels that his effort in this or that particular angle would be more effective than wasting his effort on other angles that other people may be more well equipped to handle it… For instance you may be a better candidate addressing the Bollyn’s affair while Hoffman is certainly a better equipped person when it comes to discussing Judaism, Talmud, WWII and the Jewish Holocaust myth with its related subjects and that does not discredit him. However in your mind anyone that does not discuss the Bollyn’s affair is automatically discredited in that case it is your problem and it would be an immature approach to say the least on your part if that was the case.

Hoffman did discuss the General Eisenhower’s death camps and the bombing of Dresden but he does not delve into the alleged Apollo moon landing or the 9/11 events again that does not discredit him and i am not going to repeat my self so i will just point to the fact that you your self may shy away from certain subjects that you deem as controversial so i would expect that you recognize the same right of others to do the same.

As for the who is promoting who issue… Alright let’s talk about this a bit even though it is a very weak argument on your behalf really. You your self were a guest on several shows that you deem now as untrustworthy and you were promoted by people that you do not trust anymore so why again you criticize others when they get a slot on this show or get promoted by that guy!

Regarding Hufschmid hinting that Hoffman is a Jew:

What can I say? Michael A. Hoffman II is NOT a Jew and if  Hufschmid has a shred of proof then please produce it!

“Not only am I not a Jew, I am not an Edomite of any kind, Khazar, Ashkenzai or Yehudi. I am however a connoisseur of the art of jew-jitsu, something you and the other hoaxers will be learning to your sorrow, as you cross swords with me in the future.” by Michael A. Hoffman II, October 1994

I also recommend if you read and/or listen to more of Mr. Hoffman’s work to get a better grasp of his thinking process, opinions, studies and convictions and you will come to the conclusion that it is impossible that this Man is a Jew, favors the Jew and their causes or covers up for them… I can not express how ridiculous is it for anyone to make such of a cheap hint after looking into a portion of the man’s work on the subject of Judaism.

Example #2: G. Edward Griffin

On you state that “Griffin exposes the Federal Reserve, but he also protects Zionism. His material about the Federal Reserve may be bait to lure people away from the people who are being honest. It is possible that his job is to lure people away from the Money Masters video.”

Please correct me if i am wrong but a portion of Griffin’s work i.e. “The Creature from Jekyll Island, 1994″ was used as the basis of the Jekyll Island meeting portion of The Money Masters documentary and to add insult to the injury Griffin’s book is posted on the Money Masters web site under the recommended readings section with tags such as best book and a must read so how is it exactly that Griffin wrote his book prior to The Money Masters documentary to “lure people away from the Money Masters video”?

Then on you go and attack one of the Money Masters makers that you earlier hinted that Griffin was trying to lure people away from their work so which is it!?

As for the difference in opinion between Griffin and The Money Masters team on some points regarding how to reform the situation that is simply a difference in opinion between people who know what they are talking about that does not discredit any of them besides The Money Masters website does state this point on Griffin’s book section “This is the best book presently available on the subject. We take exception only to some relatively minor points and the concluding return-to-the-gold-standard solution proposed, which is quite different from the solution proposed in the Money Masters”. Non of them however went on a crusade to discredit the other since they are “mature” people.

As for you to condemn Griffin on not talking about this or discussing that… I talked about this issue in the Hoffman section yet i am going to address it yet again since this is a common theme with you…

Condemning Griffin for this is silly as blaming Marie-Monique Robin the maker of Le monde selon Monsanto/The World According to Monsanto for not talking about 9/11 and NASA’s integrity i mean come on what do you want from the guy… May be i should start blaming Pat Carmack for not being schooled in the arts of martial arts to kick some Rothschild butt…

There are a lot of cases that can be examined but i will rest with these two.


Mr. Hufschmid, Your attitude and your successive and excessive accusations targeted at good people of being Jews and Misinformation agents has done more harm to the post 9/11 anti-Jewish stream more than it did any good. In fact i think that you Mr. Hufschmid single handedly damaged any possible unity among the post 9/11 anti-jewish anti-zionist body stream of people. You have tarnished a lot of good people reputations based on what!? Based on difference in opinion and trivial matters.

It is like if someone does not agree with you a 100% he is automatically omitted as a zionist agent, a jew or this or that and this is childish and it draws a lot of questioning on the methods you used to accuse almost everyone under the sun of being this or that to the extend that when you are done with your never ending inquisition no one will be left worthy as an honest man except for you.

The amount of discordance that you have created in the anti-jewish movement is irreparable for goodness sakes you have accused people that lost their jobs for interviewing you of being agents to the zionist and that when you are feeling good i mean thank goodness you have not called them jews.

Only the Jew is happy with this amount of discord that you have created and no one else laughing but the Jew.

I do not have it in me now to further discuss the CJB issue so may be later if you would not mind me continue e-mailing you from time to time.

And i like to add that i hope that this e-mail does not bring any animosity between us although i doubt it and like i said in my first e-mail to you i regard you highly for your 9/11 work and i thank you for it.

Also i like to let you know that i am going to post the contents of this e-mail over at for an obvious reasons.

(English is my second language so please forgive my faulty English.)

Have a good day and Godspeed.